Stratum X (Iron Age II, 10th-8th century BCE)
Remains of this period were retrieved in Area A and C (Fig. 4). In Area C, a
segment of a massive wall, ca. 2 m thick has been uncovered. Judging from the
pottery, it probably represented the fortification wall of the settlement from
the 10th/9th to the 8th/7th century BCE.
Stratum IX (Iron Age III, second half of the 7th century BCE)
Remains of a monumental structure were retrieved in Area A (Fig. 4). The walls
of it were built with marginally dressed ashlars, arranged in the
“headers-and-stretchers” technique, whose upper layers were probably of sundried
mud bricks, as evident from the rich brick debris covering the area, recalling
the technique of many Iron Age structures throughout Israel; a channel crosses
both walls and floor (Fig. 5). So far it cannot be attributed to any defined
building type, yet an official building having the control over the harbor area
should not be excluded. Its pottery assemblage contains both local and imported
East Greek pottery typical of the 8th and mainly late 7th centuries BCE material
(Fig. 6), yet it lacks East Greek pottery decorated with goats (“wild goat
style”), unlike Mazad Hashavyahu, which is only ca. 1.5 kms far from Yavneh-Yam.
Among the finds are also scarabs and Judean stone weights, one with the Hebrew
inscription pym (which is part of one sheqel) (Fig. 7). Based on these finds and
parallels from contemporary sites, it seems that the end of Yavneh-Yam Stratum
IX may be similarly set at 604 BCE (Babylonian military activities also
destroying Ashkelon), without excluding, however, an earlier date such as that
of Psammetich’s campaign in the twenties of the 7th century BCE or Pharaoh
Necho’s military activities in the year 609 BCE.
Stratum VIII (Babylonian period, first half of the 6th century BCE)
Remains of this stratum have been retrieved only in the western part of Area A.
Stratum VII (Persian period, 6th – 4th centuries BCE)
Remains from this period were retrieved both in Area A and B; that from Area A
(Fig. 8) was built over the leveled mud brick debris of Stratum IX. It consisted
of two walls creating an elongated courtyard with some smaller walls attached to
the latter. Both here and in the southwestern corner of Area B (see
Fig. 21:
Plan of Area B), the walls are built according to the Phoenician building
technique of combining ashlar piers of the local kurkar with fieldstone fills;
the Yavneh-Yam find so far represents the southernmost point along the
Phoenician-Palestinian coast (Fig. 9). The finds include a large inventory of
both local and imported pottery. The local ware consisted of the well-known
repertoire of Persian period Palestine. Imported pottery consists of amphorae
and mainly black and red-figure pottery of 5th- and 4th-centuries-BCE Attic
style (Fig. 10). In addition, some terracotta figurines of Greek-Persian style
and Milesian and Phoenician coins of the 4th century BCE can be mentioned, such
as one from Sidon in Lebanon (Fig. 11Aa-b). Attic pottery in the Persian period Yavneh-Yam seems to reflect intensive commercial ties with the Greek world,
without excluding a presence of Greek factors at the site.
Stratum VI (Hellenistic period, 3rd –1st centuries BCE)
After it had assimilated the interaction of Oriental and Greek culture, Yavneh-Yam
became together with other maritime sites the bulwark of Hellenistic rule in the
country. This period is marked at Yavneh-Yam by a fragmentary Greek inscription
(Fig. 12) representing the correspondence between the Seleucid king King
Antiochus (V) Eupator and the citizen of Yavneh-Yam, with the mention of the
exact date: the month Loos of year 149 of the Seleucid calendar (June-July 163
BCE). It reads:
Letter A: “[King An]tiochus to Nessos, greetings. The recorded petition was
submitted by [the Sid]onians [in the Port of Iamneia]. Since...the...referred to
are [also] immune...so that they will also enjoy the same privileges. Farewell.
Loos 149.”
Letter B: “Petition to [King] Antiochus Eupator from the Sidonians in the [Port
of Iamneia]. Since [their ancestors] rendered many services to his grandfather,
promptly obeying [all] instructions regarding the naval service...”
These
letters should be seen against the background of the struggle between Greeks and
Jews since it seems that both Yavneh-Yam’s Graecized population was frightened
by the Maccabean impetus as well as the Seleucid king. Yavneh-Yam had a good
reason to do so, as can easily be substantiated with the passage from II Maccabees 12: 9, 39-46 about the fire set by Judas Maccabaeus on the ships in
the harbor of Yavneh-Yam (the opening passage of this essay). Even if
disputable, this event reflects a certain atmosphere occurring during this time.
Remains from the Hellenistic period were retrieved in Yavneh-Yam mainly in Area
A, consisting of a reuse of previous walls and building material which was now
partly covered with painted plaster, sometimes even modeled for specific
architectural decoration such as the fragment of a triglyph. A violent
destruction put an end to this stratum. The pottery includes imported fine/table
ware, amphorae, and local, semi-fine and everyday ware.
The fine ware contains
the main types of the Hellenistic repertoire such as moldmade bowls, red-glossed
dishes, thin-walled drinking cups, etc. (Fig. 13). Hellenistic imported
amphorae, which can be recognized by a great variety of stamped handles (Fig.
14), and coins of the Seleucid ruler Antiochus VII Sidetes (Fig. 15) imply the
economic organization of the Hellenized cities. A large number of muricid shells
(Fig. 16) have been found in this stratum, reflecting one of the main sources of
income for which the Phoenicians became so famous, namely the production of
purple. A terracotta statuette of a harp-playing girl (Fig. 17) and a glass
pendant of Harpokrates (Fig. 18) also point to the Graecized character of the
population of the site. Judging from the finds corroborated with historical
sources, it seems likely that Hellenistic Yavneh-Yam was destroyed by the
Hasmonean ruler John Hyrcanus towards the end of the 2nd century BCE, as were
other Palestinian Grecized towns such as Marisa, Samaria, and Scythopolis.
Stratum V (Early Roman period, 1st century BCE – 2nd century CE)
Only some finds can be sofar attributed to this period: “Herodian” bow-shaped
nozzle lamps and Roman “discus” lamps, stone measuring vessels, and four
ossuaries (Fig. 19) from the Kaplan excavations, all of which point to the
Jewish presence at the site.
Stratum IV (Late Roman period, 3rd – 4th centuries CE)
Remains of this stratum have been notified only in Area B. They include a larger
building and water and sewage channels. Remains of horrea (storehouses) with
mosaic pavements yielded some lamps of the Beit Nattif type and quite a large
number of coins from the 4th and 5th centuries CE.
Stratum III (Byzantine period, 5th-7th centuries CE)
A real revival of the site can be dated to the Byzantine period, mainly the 5th
and 6th centuries CE, reflecting the peak of development of the Land of Israel
since The Holy Land now enjoyed the economic advantages of pilgrimage. In Area
A, segments of an elaborated mosaic pavement are noteworthy (Fig. 20) and can be
dated to the 6th century CE; they could have been part of a church. Monumental
marble bases and columns and a marble bowl reused in Early Islamic structures
could also have belonged to the latter. This mosaic pavement was partly
unearthed in 1995 and then covered by sand in order to preserve it. It waits for
a systematic uncovering for which financial means and volunteers are needed.
|Page 1|Page 2|
Look
for academic tools and books for biblical studies at Dove
Books.
Return to Home Page
Return to Articles and Commentary