|
|
There are different versions about how long the
siege of Masada lasted. Josephus does not
discuss this issue. However, it is very obvious
that the siege did not begin immediately
following the destruction of Jerusalem. First,
the fortresses of Herodium and Machaerus were
conquered, and then Lucilius Bassus (who was
sent to Judea as legate) died and was replaced
in command by Flavius Silva (who succeeded him
as procurator of Judea). Silva had to gather his
forces and only then launched the final attack
on Masada. All these processes took
time.
Most researchers seem to accept that the siege
and fall of Masada only took a few months—Probably
from the winter of 72/73 A.D. until the
following spring—A matter of 4-6 (maybe 8)
months. In fact, Roth's impressively meticulous
study (1995) states:
All
in all, a nine-week siege is the likely
maximum, a four-week siege the likely minimum,
and a siege of seven weeks the most probable
length for the siege of Masada. Postulating a
siege of some seven weeks fits in well with
the date given by Josephus for the fall of the
fortress, whatever calendar is being used (p.
109).
Moreover, this conclusion is supported by the
recent geological attention paid to the fact
that the massive siege ramp on the west side of
Masada is based on a natural huge spur. If so,
then the Roman army did not have to build the
big siege ramp from the bottom of the mountain,
but only to add the actual ramp on top of that
natural spur. This means that constructing the
ramp took a significantly less effort than
previously assumed by some (see Gill's 1993
work).
While in Josephus's description of the siege of
Jerusalem he describes rather courageous raids
made by the Jewish defenders of Jerusalem
against the Romans, no such descriptions are
available for the siege on Masada. This is a
significant omission because after Jerusalem
fell, the Roman army went on to conquer three
other fortresses. One was Herodium, which fell
rather quickly. The other was Machaerus where
the Jews put a courageous fight including raids
against the Roman army. Moreover, Josephus had a
clear "interest" to present the heroic
fight put by the Jews so as to demonstrate just
how much more heroic was the Roman army
that conquered them. His failure to mention any
active fights or resistance (or raids) by
Masada's defenders against the Romans is not
insignificant. Thus, while the impression one
typically gets through the historian’s
description of fights, battles and struggles, is
that there was a war around Jerusalem, no such
impression is projected about the Roman siege of
Masada. In other words, there really was no
"battle" around Masada.
|Page
1|Page 2|Page
3|Page 4|Page
5|
|Page 6|Page
7|Page 8|Page
9|
|Notes|Bibliography|
Return to Home
Page
|